In Milton’s ‘Paradise Lost’, Satan postulates that it is “Better to reign in Hell, than to serve in Heaven”. Interestingly, I’ve come across a completely opposite mindset lately.
On my travels across India in the last few months, I had occasion to speak to a lot of people about the changing political landscape. There were very many valid concerns about the rise of radicalism and right wing rhetoric, about callous and unthinking laws being put into motion to the detriment of the common man, about the lack of infra structure to support the rapid expansion of metropolitan cities and/or small towns, and a general fearfulness and dread that democracy, such as it is, was being eroded by an authoritarian government.
However, what shocked and saddened me was the stance of a particular generation. This is the generation that was born shortly after India gained its Independence from the British. This is the generation who was too young to remember what it was like in the days of the Raj, but old enough to have enjoyed the remaining benefits of a disciplined governance and a healthy infra structure. Their stance is paradoxical to Satan/Lucifer’s. They truly believe that as Indians we were better off being ruled by the British. That we are a corrupt and morally bankrupt nation with a slavish mentality. That, like chaotic teenagers on the loose, we will end up destroying India. That, under the British, there was cohesion and rule of law and a principled superintendence.
Of course there was. The British saw the Empire as an extension of Britain. They plundered while they ruled. But they also built the railways and the schools and the courts, and everything was tickety-boo. For them.
Winston Churchill, that great hero who led Britain to victory in World War 2, once said, “I hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion.” His antediluvian statements can be dismissed as the thought process of the time. Of a culmination of the Imperialism practiced by many European nations, with the justification of subjugating, colonising and ultimately benefitting the savage natives of the East and of Africa.
Yet, by admitting that we were better off as a colony, aren’t we also admitting to being those very repugnant savages that Britain chose to bring to heel?
India had a rich and varied cultural history much before she was colonised. There was education, tradition, art forms and healthy trade. There was also casteism, infighting and poverty. It wasn’t perfect. Nothing ever is. What over two hundred years of colonisation did was try and make India into a pale facsimile of Britain. And that is the vision that some choose to cling to, to this day.
While I am not in agreement with the myth of the puritanical Hindu land where aeroplanes and surgery were invented in whatever century B.C., neither do I agree that India should have stayed under the British Raj. Whatever great muddle the country is in now, it is it’s OWN muddle. One that the free thinkers, the activists and the common public, will help unravel in due course.
70 years of Independence may not have necessarily evened the playing field for everyone. Yet, as a relatively nascent nation rebuilding itself, India hasn’t done too badly. Every nation carries the burden of its history. What it chooses to do with it, is entirely to its own discretion.
Chosen servitude is voluntary abdication of responsibility. It is a cop out of magnificent proportions. Can anyone be happy being enslaved? As Thucydides, the ancient Athenian historian once said, “The secret to happiness is freedom…And the secret to freedom is courage.”
mschwaabe says
I’ve encountered similar sentiments in francophone Africa. It takes time for a nation’s political institutions to grow and develop, The critical question, which every society needs to resolve – and do so over, and over again – is that of empowerment. Put another way: what is the maximum level of dis-empowerment and inequality that a society can live with without fracturing? The discourse you describe is that of a lack of empowerment, although expressed in historical terms regarding the colonial past, actually pertains to today and overlays a sense that the problems are so big that they simply cannot be solved.
Often, when people expressing such views, a thread that can be explored is the privilege they enjoy in their society that facilitates such an abdication of responsibility.
Thank you Poornima!
poornimamanco says
Thank you Michael! You have just added a nuanced thread to my post. Yes, people need to ponder why they feel dis-empowered & apathetic? What can they do to alleviate that? And whether choosing to be enslaved is really the answer?
mschwaabe says
I think part of the answer lies in making the culture within which a person exists visible to that individual. It’s a form of reflexive thinking, rather like a fish being able to “see” the water in which they swim. When one realises the extent to which chance rules our lives and the extent to which socially learnt roles trap us into behaviours, then one can start stepping out by choosing other ways to behave and interact with people.